TITVS ADVXAS - THE CENTVRION OF TRVTH On February 1st 2010, TITVS ADVXAS was reopened but will now be more light-hearted, being run by a third party. Titvs Advxas has agreed to this on the understanding that it continues with its Nationalist theme... Disclaimer: Please note that these posts are entirely the opinion of the authors not the British National Party nor anyone else. ,

Monday, 18 May 2009

Press Bias & The London Daily News BY TITVS-ADVXAS

BNP Poster on LDN website
Screenshot of LDN web poll



Are my eyes deceiving me?


Well the day started off, as TITVS, the family taxi driver, was taking his PATER to East Birmingham Hospital (aka Heartlands Hospital) where he was a day patient. Whilst waiting, MATER showed him the scandalous lies on today's page 11 of THE SUN. Not believing their own son, TITVS texted a member of The BNP, who confirmed that Adam Walker would never say those things about The Gurkha's and that The BNP support all facets of The Armed forces, and their pledge that The Armed Forces will be built back up, to defend our shores and our shores alone. I daresay that if in the future, say New Zealand, Canada or Australia became threatened by a foreign power, That we would be there to help them, just as they Canada and The ANZACS did with us in WW1&2, but we wouldn't support an illegal war, if say NZ decided to invade Easter Island for no other reason than Easter Island were stockpiling Easter Eggs Of Mass Destruction!
Furthermore, Nick Griffin reports in Operation Fightback that The BNP will be taking legal action against The Scum Newspaper, who we now hear have withdrawn the article...


Then the real shock: I then received an email from a good friend in Solihull. Linked to thelondondailynewsdotcom which is the online remnants of the short lived THE LONDON DAILY NEWS. I assume that The LDN does have right wing tendancies (or they are setting us up for a sting or a fall)

BNP set for record win on June 4 Euro elections


News DeskThe far-right British National Party is projected in a London Daily News poll to gain around 30 per cent of the vote in London which would result in up to 2-3 MEPs in the capital, and 7-8 MEPs nationally.Conservative activists who have been canvassing aggressively the last weeks have been reporting a "stark increase" in BNP support on the doorsteps alarming many Tory grandees that the right wing of politics is being hijacked by the far right BNP.The scandal over MPs expenses has eclipsed any concerns over immigration in the capital according to canvassers from the main political parties, and a "political meltdown" for the main political groups could take place on June 4, if voters do not turn out.The London Daily News poll of 4433 votes shows the following:

Labour : 7.76% (345)

Conservative : 41.79% (1857)

Liberal Democrat : 13.46% (598)

Green : 1.91% (85)

BNP : 29.91% (1329)

UKIP : 2.72% (121)

Other : 2.45% (109)

If the BNP was to win the projected 7 seats nationally according to reports, it would lead a "European nationalists" block in the European Parliament led by BNP leader Nick Griffiths, with the group being entitled to £5 million in political funding from the EU.The following days will see a concerted campaign by the main political parties to undermine the efforts of the BNP with an attempt to dissuade voters to "waste their vote" by voting for the BNP. Labour has already started a "Stop the BNP" leaflet which is being distributed to local parties nationally. The Daily Telegraph ran a story that most of the BNPs new support is from disgruntled Labour voters:"The Labour Party used to stand for what we believe in. Now, no way. It's not just immigration that has changed; it's our way of life. We're becoming a Third World country in Europe with no influence, no power and the people not knowing anything about their own history." Sources within the Conservative hierarchy are "so concerned" by the BNP that publicly they do not even refer to it, and just refer to the BNP as "that evil party".

The European Parliamentary elections June 4 will be run with a proportional representation method

Sunday, 17 May 2009

SIR GERALD KAUFMAN by TITVS ADVXAS

I am again speechless! This NEW LABOUR MP who was awarded a knighthood for services to Parliament in the Queen's Birthday Honours in 2004 seems to have made his claims to just within the maximum, and in one instance given below to within 6p of the maximum, yet he also claims he didn't understand his gas bill.
PLEASE DON'T GIVE ME THAT
Sir Gerald Kaufman and his Regents Park flat


Sir Gerald Kaufman's £1,800 rug and an £8,865 claim for a television: MPs' expenses

Sir Gerald Kaufman charged the taxpayer £1,851 for a rug he imported from a New York antiques centre and tried to claim £8,865 for a television.

The former environment minister was asked to attend a meeting with officials from the parliamentary fees office to discuss details of another claim relating to £28,834 of work on the kitchen and bathroom at his London flat.
He told them that the work was necessary because he was “living in a slum”, though his second home, off Regent’s Park, is in one of the most fashionable areas of the capital. He was eventually reimbursed for £15,329. On one occasion he asked a civil servant “why are you querying these
expenses?” and on another threatened to make a complaint unless a dispute was settled by noon on the day in question. In one document, an official in the fees office noted that invoices Sir Gerald had submitted took him to “within 6p” of his annual limit. He also claimed £1,262 for a gas bill that was £1,055 in credit.
Between 2001 and 2008 the Manchester Gorton MP, one of the Labour party’s longest-serving members, claimed a total of £115,109 in additional costs allowances on his London flat, which he owns outright. In June 2006, he submitted a claim for three months’ expenses totalling £14,301.60, which included £8,865 for a Bang & Olufsen Beovision 40in LCD television. The maximum amount MPs are allowed to claim for TVs is £750.
On July 7, 2006 the fees office wrote to Sir Gerald to say: “I regret to inform you that this item falls within the not allowable category of luxurious furnishings, and as such has been rejected.”
He was paid £750.
In March 2007 Sir Gerald submitted a claim for £1,461.83 for a “second-hand rug replacing 24-year-old carpet”, with an additional £389.91 for “customs duty on rug”, which was paid. The receipt showed that Sir Gerald bought the rug from the Showplace Antique Centre on West 25th Street in Manhattan for $2,750. The Green Book strictly forbids “antique, luxury or premium grade” furnishings.
Later that year, on Dec 29, Sir Gerald, who was knighted in 2004, submitted an invoice from ABC Carpets in Harrods for £598, which was also paid.
A note of a telephone conversation between Sir Gerald, 78, and an official in the fees office, states that his reasons for claiming £28,834 for home improvements between 2005 and 2007 were: “Old flat, facilities out of date, decrepit, health reasons, update, living in slum.” Sir Gerald added that he had “not carried out any repairs/maintenance for 32 years”.
Sir Gerald was also challenged over regular claims for “odd jobs” which he submitted without receipts at a rate of £245 every month — £5 below the then limit for unreceipted expenses. He replied: “Why are you querying these expenses?”
On May 18, a senior official in the fees office noted details of another conversation about the kitchen and bathroom, saying: “MP believes that I have seen a detailed breakdown of the £12,416.51 claim he has submitted [for that financial year]… MP is becoming agitated and will be making an official complaint against me, if this matter is not resolved by 12 noon today.” When detailed invoices were submitted, they included £575 for undertile heating in the shower room and £2,695 for Bosch and Miele kitchen appliances. Sir Gerald was asked to attend a meeting with officials on the matter and the fees office eventually agreed to pay him £15,329 of the £28,834. Sir Gerald accepted, saying that he wanted to “draw a line under the issue”.
In June last year Sir Gerald submitted a £1,262 claim for his gas bill, covering the period March 2006 to May 2008. The fees office pointed out that his gas account was £1,055.60 in credit, and only agreed to pay £122.46.
A note in the file on July 10, 2008 quotes Sir Gerald as saying: “I received a letter from [official] saying not pay as is credit. I paid £1,252 THIS year so want reimbursing!!!”
The fees office wrote to him on July 14 to say: “You might wish to ask British Gas to repay you the credit.”
Sir Gerald’s claims between 2004 and June 2008 also included £19,200 for food — close to the maximum — and £4,692 for cleaning.
Last night Sir Gerald offered to repay the money for the rug and admitted that his claim for the £8,000 television was “a bit daft”.
He said that his flat had been in need of complete refurbishment because he had “neglected” it over the years and he had overclaimed for the gas bill because he “misunderstood” the invoice.
He said that his odd jobs bill was actually more than £245 a month, so he had claimed close to the limit. His food claim was “appropriate” because his job meant he often had to “spend a lot of money” eating out, he added.
Sir Gerald Kaufman
Job: backbench Labour MP
Salary: £64,766
Total second home claims
2004-05: £16,085
2005-06: £21,634
2006-07: £21,420
2007-08: £13,558
TITVS says that this man should be:
  • STRIPPED OF HIS KNIGHTHOOD AND THE BENEFITS IT GIVES
  • MADE TO PAY BACK EVERY SINGLE PENNY CLAIMED, BY SELLING HIS PROPERTY
  • TRIED BY THE CPS FOR FRAUD
Remember, If you or I made a similar "mistake" in our DSS benefits claim, we would be:
  • interviewed under caution
  • lose our entire livelihood (currently £48 per week for basic single person income support)
  • get a criminal record to boot
  • Furthermore, if we were say living on the proceeds of crime, all our assets would be frozen and utilised by the government following our conviction!

Compare GERALD KAUFMAN MP to RUSSELL GREEN BNP (yesterday's blog).

There's no comparison is there? Mr Green is an honorable, honest and decent man. Kaufman is a NEW LABOUR MP (and no further description is required)

Because they both float to the top, there's only one way to separate THE CREAM (The BNP) from THE SCUM (The LIB/LAB/CON):

VOTE FOR THE BNP ON JUNE 4th 2009

TITVS ADVXAS XVII-V-MMIX

Saturday, 16 May 2009

BNP Councillor Publishes 'IN-excessive' Expenses BY TITVS ADVXAS

Day after day this month we have seen the utter greed of our MP's on the front pages of our tabloids and broadsheets, due mainly but not entirely to The Daily Telegraph. Any anger that we had about the vast amounts our local football stars receive for 5 days of golf practice and 90 minutes of abysmal letdowns, has been fully and deservedly redirected at those Disgustingly Blase Westminster Swine Trough Merchants. Anyone who saw a smarmy faced Margaret Beckett on Question Time will by now be wishing to reintroduce The Death Penalty for them...

How refreshing it was amongst all this to see the expense claims of Mister Sandwell, Russ Green, a BNP Councillor for THREE years, published for all to see on THE BLACK COUNTRY PATRIOT Blog


"Cllr Russ Green comes clean" !


As we see the shocking level of depravity that the Lib,Lab,Con greedy, self serving pigs in Westminster have descended to, Councillor Russ Green thought it was time to give all the details of his own income :-
Annual income £14,793,
Net income £880 per month
Expenses claimed :-
Travel £0,00
food £0,00
Nappies £0,00
moat maintenance £0,00
Cat food £0,00
40-inch flat screen TV £0,00
Bath plugs £0,00
Gardening services £0,00
Fireplaces £0,00


Cllr Russ Green has not claimed a single penny in expenses in three years as a Councillor !


Every Lib,Lab,Con Councillor at Sandwell Council has taken full advantage of free state of the art computers, combined with hand held mobile computers and accessories,
Councillor Russ Green is the only Councillor at Sandwell Council that has refused to accept such extravagances,
Councillor Russ Green uses his own computer and pays for his own connection to the internet !


Like other BNP councillors across the land he has claimed £0.00 in expenses whatsoever

Vote for honesty and decency ! Vote for the "BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY" on June the 4th !



©TITVS-ADVXAS-XVI-V-MMIX
As Published

Friday, 15 May 2009

More Celebrity Stalkers BY TITVS ADVXAS

Following my recent revelation that The blog of my alter ego 'Clark Kent' is followed by Sandwell Celebrity Councillor Russell 'Hi De Hi' Green, I have today seen that The TITVS ADVXAS CENTVRION OF TRVTH blog figures TWICE in BNP deputy supremo Simon Darby's TOP LIVE FEEDS, at position ONE and SEVEN...
WOW!!!
Bring back TOP OF THE POPS...

P.S. Viewers of this blog may have noticed that I am slipping BNP and other stuff all over the blog. I am learning slowly how to manipulate html code. It is quite easy to amend and alter existing things and then add it to your blog. What I cant do yet is write stuff from scratch. If any reader wants help in doing this, then email me titvs.advxas@gmail.com I cant promise I will be able to do it, but I can try...

©TITVS-ADVXAS-XV-V-MMIX

As Published


Thursday, 14 May 2009

The Sheer Obscenity By TITVS ADVXAS

The real obscenity of the unfolding MP's Expenses scandal is not just wide ranging types of claim and their utterly unprecedentedly large values. To me it's the blatant retort from each and every one of them that "It's within the rules" coupled with the fact that these thieves, liars and cheats can simply write out a cheque for the full amount, further proof that these claims are unwarranted and unnecessary.
The highest ones made public so far being £66,000 from NEW LABOUR and ANTI BNP Muslim MP, Shahid Malik, £41,000 in the case of NEW LABOUR's Phil Hope and £22,500 for NEW LABOUR's Margaret Moran. Today's expulsion from
NEW LABOUR of Elliot Morley by PM Gordon Brown is the latest embarrassment for the premiere.
Published from the BNP website is this about our old friend MP Shahid Malik

Muslim Labour MP Shahid Malik, who spends most of his time campaigning against the British National Party or predicting a totally Islamified Britain, has been revealed as the biggest swindler of them all, ripping off taxpayers more than any other single member of parliament.
Mr Malik, who incredibly is also “Justice Minister” (we wonder what type of “justice”), has been exposed as claiming thousands of pounds in taxpayer allowances on his second home while renting his main home at a heavily discounted rate. Mr Malik claimed £66,827 over three years on his house in London (£18,173 less than its original purchase price) while renting his main home in Dewsbury at a discounted rent of less than £100 a week.
Last year, he claimed £23,083 from the taxpayer for his London town house, equivalent to £443 per week. Mr Malik’s arrangement means he pays below market rent for his main home while billing taxpayers thousands for his second home in London.
The MP for Dewsbury also claimed for thousands of pounds’ worth of furniture and electrical equipment including £2,600 for a home cinema system - which was cut in half by the Commons Fees Office - and £730 for a massage chair.
Other items Mr Malik has claimed for include a £671 fireplace, a leather daybed sofa and a £510 fitted wardrobe. He attempted to make claims for an iPod and portable DVD player but these were rejected by the fees office as outrageous even by their already twisted standards.
Laughably, Mr Malik, who just last week took part in a coordinated media smear campaign against the BNP, defended himself by blaming the Fees Office rules.
“The expenses system is flawed,” Mr Malik said in his defence. “I have not broken any rules.”
Mr Malik confirmed that he had put a claim in for a home cinema system costing £2,600.
“I rang the Fees Office and asked if there was a limit to what I could spend before I bought a TV and they said ‘No’. I did think at the time that was madness,” he said, ignoring the fact that he still willingly participated in this “madness.”
Mr Malik also faces allegations over the fact that his landlord in Dewsbury, millionaire Tahir Zaman, was fined in 2005 for letting a house to a family of five despite a council enforcement order classing the building as “uninhabitable.”
Mr Zaman also received more than £4,000 a year from Mr Malik for renting out his constituency office to him. The money is funded from a separate system of parliamentary expenses.
In what is possibly one of the most incredible revelations to date, Mr Malik also claimed £65 for a court summons for council tax non-payment, making the taxpayer pick up the tab for the fines incurred by his personal unpaid debts.
Mr Malik is possibly most famous for predicting a totally Islamified Britain. At least he has given us the ability to see what type of standards we can expect once this happens.
* Yet another former Labour cabinet minister, Clare Short, has admitted claiming thousands of pounds to which she was not entitled.
Miss Short claimed the full cost of her mortgage for two and half years despite being only entitled to charge for the interest.
When the mistake was spotted in 2006 by the Commons Fees Office, Miss Short wrote to officials saying they should “accept some responsibility for the situation” for not spotting her error earlier. In total the ex-Labour MP claimed £8,436 more than she was entitled to.
Miss Short submitted regular claims towards decorating at her second home, including hundreds of pounds’ worth of work on a summer house and conservatory, as well as her porch, patio and kitchen. She also charged more than £1,500 for repainting costs.
Miss Short expressed regret to the media, telling them that the revelations “may increase the vote for the BNP.”

©TITVS-ADVXAS-XIV-V-MMIX
As Published

Add a TITVS ADVXAS - CENTVRION OF TRVTH button

...like the one below to your blog:

TITVS ADVXAS - THE CENTVRION OF TRVTH

TITVS-ADVXAS
email TITVS with your specification (width/height etc)