A reply to my letter to The Chief Constable of Derbyshire By TITVS ADVXAS

Message

Just been visiting people in the smallest county in the land, Rutland. We got back here at about 6pm, with fairly comfortable traffic, both ways.

In my mailbox was a reply to the complaint I'd made about the disproportionate way that police deal with state sponsored thuggery (such as that exhibited by the UAF during our RWB festival) and the way police deal with anti state protestation (I cited an example from neighbouring force, South Yorkshire during the miners strike 25 years earlier, known as The Battle of Orgreave)

As promised, here is the full reply, which is basically an acknowledgement of my complaint.

Message:

Dear Mr Advxas

I refer to the complaint you made in your e mail dated 17 August 2009.

It appears that your complaint concerns the quality of services provided by the Constabulary and, as such, is an issue of 'Direction and Control' as defined by the Police Reform Act 2002[1].

I have recorded your complaint under the above Quality of Service reference and have forwarded your correspondence to Chief Superintendent Sherwood, Divisional Commander, 'A' Division, for allocation to a senior officer to look into the issues you raise. You should expect an officer from that division to contact you shortly to discuss your concerns. During the course of these enquiries, if any officer is found to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour, the matter will be referred back to Professional Standards Department for reassessment.

Please be assured that Derbyshire Constabulary is committed to providing a high quality of service to the public. You may be interested to know that the Constabulary was only the second police force to secure both the prestigious 'Investors in People' and 'Chartermark' awards, in recognition of our commitment to excellence in public service, and recently became the first police force to achieve accreditation under the Government's Customer Service Excellence Standard.

Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. This is one way that we receive feedback from the public. It is only by the actions of people such as yourself taking the trouble to contact us that we can improve the quality of service provided to all, or have the opportunity to provide an explanation for a particular situation or policing response.

Yours sincerely



on behalf of Richard Oldknow
Superintendent

Head of Professional Standards Department

[1] Section 12 of The Police Reform Act 2002 deals with complaints of misconduct by police officers and staff. The Independent Police Complaints Commission [IPCC] is responsible for overseeing complaints of misconduct against persons serving with the police. As it appears that your complaint does not relate to the conduct of a person serving with the police, but operational policing policies, organisational management decisions or the general standard of policing, it has been recorded as a 'Direction and Control' complaint under the above reference.



PLEASE NOTE: This e-mail message is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential or privileged to Derbyshire Constabulary. If you have received it in error, please notify the originator immediately and destroy this email and any attachments. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Derbyshire Constabulary, who accept no legal responsibility for the contents. Please be aware Derbyshire Constabulary monitors all internet e-mail activity and content to maintain system performance and appropriate business usage.

WEBSITE: Join the policing family at Derbyshire Constabulary. We are recruiting Special Constables. For more details visit http://www.derbyshire.police.uk

WARNING: E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, viruses, unauthorised amendments and unforeseen delays. Derbyshire Constabulary scans all e-mail for viruses, but we accept no liability for any damage caused by a virus being transmitted in this email or any other data corruption, interception, unauthorised amendment, delays or the consequences thereof.

We must now wait and see if the appalling treatment that my family received at the hand of The State funded Fascist UAF will be dealt with, or whether, as I suspect, I will get fobbed off again!

©TITVS-ADVXAS I-IX-MMIX
As Published

Letter to the Chief Constable of Derbyshire From TITVS ADXAS

From TITVS ADVXAS

4a Council-not-Social-House,
The Acocks Green Council Estate,
Birmingham B27 FKU.

Sunday 16th August 2009

To Chief Constable Mick Creedon
Derbyshire Constabulary
Police Headquarters,
Butterley Hall,
Ripley,
Derbyshire,
DE5 3RS

Dear Mr Creedon,

I am a card holding, fee paying member of the British National Party, and I attended their Red White and Blue festival in Denby, yesterday (15th August 2009).

Arriving at the junction of Breach Road and Denby Common at about 9.00am, there was a crowd of UAF supporters blocking access to Breach Road, and one of your officers told me forcefully and without need, to reverse my car.

I complied, even though I have a current driving licence, with no ban or endorsements, I have fully comprehensive insurance, my car is less than 3 years old, so it doesn't require a valid MOT and its road fund licence is upto date, and furthermore I am not 'wanted' by the police having no outstanding fines, warrants or convictions.

Thus the police allowed the mob of people illegally blocking the road to be given precedence of me, a legal driver in my own car.

I was told to park in a pub car park 100 yards away, and wait for the police to deal with the mob.

I note that from press reports only 19 people were arrested and of them only four faced further charges.

The police then used reasonable force only to restrict the baying mob.

I would like to ask why riot police using tear gas and water cannons were not deployed to disperse the mob, as the police have done in the past, such as your neighbouring force, South Yorkshire did on 18 June 1984 in Orgreave near Rotherham?

Is the reason that as being a sub-unit of the government, the UAF get special privilege?

I would also like to comment on one helicopter, which spent all day hovering directly over the 'Political tent' and was so low that it drowned out the speakers voices, even with our sophisticated PA system in use.

Can I further assume that you were acting under direct orders from The Home Office to make this constant interference with our members being unable to follow what the speakers were saying?

In a country that purports to democracy and free speech, and where the BNP are regularly vilified in the press , the actions of your officers only gave rise to the view that they were not allowing democracy, but were condoning mob-rule from a fascist régime.

Finally, I would beg to comment on the pitifully small number of arrests and people charged, compared with the visibly high numbers who were actually causing an illegal obstruction.

Nothing that the police did made sense in my eyes.

I await you reply.

Yours sincerely,

Titvs Advxas

TITVS ADVXAS MCMLX


©TITVS-ADVXAS XVI-VIII-MMIX
As Published

UAF protesters further the resolve of the BNP family and other day-trippers By TITVS ADVXAS

Omnipresent Mike Bell,

Mr Nick Griffin MEP,

The heart of the campsite,

South Birmingham getting ready

Mick Simpkins

The Saturday morning drive from a white working class area of Birmingham, known as Acocks Green, to the Derbyshire countryside went without a hitch, until we reached Codnor Denby Lane at its junction with Heanor Lane, where the UAF protest march was due to commence, the road being completely blocked, by the mindless.

I was ordered by police to drive around to the other side, the 'other side' being Breach Road and Denby Common, where another ugly group of ugly protesters had gathered, which proved a little scary for my partner and our other passengers, who were quite troubled by the great unwashed.

I told my passengers that these ugly people are simply misguided fools and are simply following the agenda of the cowards at the top of the tree, of the UAF, the SWP, The unions, the New-Labour party, The Tory Party, and signatories of it, David Cameron, Tony Benn, Peter Hain, and Ken Livingston were the ones that came to mind.

Just think about it!

All of those political parties, organisations and other people (and more), involved in a display of fascist totalitarianism.

The elites don't want The British National Party to have a family weekend, and are prepared to use violence, through The UAF to do it, yet you never see the organ grinders at work.

Weyman Bennett, had made some noises on the internet in the days before, but not even he was around, as the red-eyed reds, who'd travelled up on the red-eye, were grunting and growling at us.

Like Simon Darby said, about 100 of us were delayed due to these creatures.

Inside the festival, we couldn't even hear the animal noises outside.

Now the Telegraph have produced their report of the commotion outside and the goings on inside, in their usual disproportionate way.

Making sure that they could call us all the usual names and try to hint at racism, they drew reference to the beastly chants from outside:

The main body of demonstrators, which was monitored by a camera mounted on a drone, gathered in Codnor's Market Place, chanting "Nazi scum, off our streets" and waving placards from campaign group Unite Against Fascism and various trade union groups.

Dozens of tents had been pitched on the BNP festival site, around 200 yards from where police were forced to hold back protesters.

Journalists from some media organisations were invited on to the site, where a political marquee had been set up to hear speeches and a Ford Ka was up for grabs in a raffle alongside stalls selling badges and pork scratchings.

A coconut shy - featuring images of Tony Blair, Jack Straw and Gordon Brown and offering festival-goers the chance to "knock a traitor off the stick" - had also been set up at the festival site.

So why mention the pork scratchings, as if we didn't know?

I, for one, enjoyed my first Red-White-and-Blue, as did my entourage, as the attempts by the Amber Valley Council to deter the party's party failed like a Labour candidate at a by-election:

• Preventing use of caravans and campervans,

• Not allowing a funfair for children,

• Not allowing a liquor license,

• Enforcing archaic laws on noise to hinder partying by BNP revellers.

What the UAF and Amber Valley did achieve, by their actions, was to further the resolve of my previously BNP-sceptical passengers, to support and go forward with the party.

They, like me, want their country back.

And like me they are prepared to back Nick Griffin and The BNP in the dark times that surely lay ahead.

©TITVS-ADVXAS XVI-VIII-MMIX
As Published