Gay police officers who had baby are both still ‘married’ to other men

The two gay police officers who became the first British same sex couple to have a baby through a relative are both still “married” to other men, it was disclosed today.

Stephen Ponder, 28, a special constable, and his partner Ivan Sigston, 43, a Hampshire police dog handler, began an affair after they met when still with their previous partners.

Now Mr Ponder is seeking a divorce from cleaner Ian Briggs, 49, while Mr Sigston is also divorcing former partner Steve Aylett, 38, a banker.

Earlier this week it was revealed that Mr Ponder's sister, Lorna Bradley, had given birth last month to a baby, named William, who was conceived using Mr Sigston's sperm. The two men are now bringing up William at their Southampton home and plan to legally adopt him.

The two gay couples are reported to have met several years ago through a gay networking site and their shared interest in dogs.

After becoming close friends, both couples were witnesses to each other's civil partnership ceremonies in 2007. But neither partnersip lasted more than a few months and Mr Ponder and Mr Sigston began a relationship. However it was disclosed today that Mr Briggs is resisting Mr Ponder's divorce application.

He was quoted as saying: "It is clear they were having an affair behind our backs. The four of us became close, but I had not idea they would end up running off. The weddings must have been a sham as they became a couple within months."

He claims to have been left in debt by Mr Ponder, but added: "I still love him and want him back." Mr Aylett has agreed to a speedy divorce from Mr Sigston.

He was quoted as saying: “I've put it behind me and want to look ahead.''

Mrs Bradley, 31, who is married with three children, is said to have volunteered to have the baby for her brother and his partner out of “sisterly love” and no fee was paid. Because Mr Sigston was not registered as the father on the birth certificate, he and Mr Ponder have to adopt the baby, who is now around three weeks old.

Re-Posted from Bedfordshire Beacon

All Titvs can add is "I hope social services become involved in this poor child's upbringing! Although in retrospect, would pc social workers actually make things worse?"

Charity By TITVS ADVXAS

Bournville Village

Austin Village

Charity, benevolence, and philanthropy are all words used to describe the assistance given by people who have ‘made’ their own fortune or been successful in business or other spheres, and are then sharing it with others less fortunate, and I would just like to compare the philanthropy of individuals to the charity from the state.

But at what price is charity to the less fortunate?

As I’ve made known, in several previous essays, I was born and raised in a white working class area of Birmingham known as Acocks Green.

There are two well known housing estates in south Birmingham.

Firstly is the Bournville Village which was built during the years 1893 to 1900 by confectioners George and Richard Cadbury.

The Cadbury brothers were considered by many to be the ultimate philanthropists.

Secondly, The Austin Village was erected slightly later, during the Great War, by industrialist munitions and car manufacturer, Herbert Austin.

Similar employee housing estates and developments exist throughout the country.

On the face of it, these estates were made for the benefits of the workers, although they were actually built to further the ulterior and selfish motives of the employers, to tie people to their house and linked to a job. The workers ended up actually working harder to safeguard their family homes.

Another facet of the Cadbury family philanthropy was to inflict their own religious views upon their own work force.

As Quakers, they were believers in temperance or the non-consumption of alcohol for pleasurable activities.

To this day covenants and bylaws in the Bournville area upon premises prohibit the sale of and the public consumption of alcohol.

This is quite minor in relative terms but still it exists.

Charity from our own country is even stranger, uneven and one sided.

On one side we are giving hundreds of millions of pounds to third world.

Countries such as India, Afghanistan, and Pakistan get aid from us. They, in turn it seems, are using vast amounts of this money, raised by our own income tax and other taxes from within The United Kingdom, to develop their own munitions and space programs.

On the other side, we have British soldiers, sailors and airmen, who in the line of duty, are severely maimed and will require lifelong assistance, are given paltry awards. And now the government is going to courts to try and reduce these minuscule payments even further.

We also have British people unable to get their fair benefits when things have gone wrong, their factory has closed, or their job has been transferred to a call centre halfway around the globe, because the treacle stick has been licked clean by the myriads of newcomers to this land.

This is not the end for us, not as long as we have faith in The British National Party, the only party that will:

End foreign aid when we still have British people living in sub standard conditions, pensioners having to make a choice between eating food and heating their homes.
Deport illegal immigrants and failed asylum seekers who are sponging from the pool of our tax contributions.
Support our own forces and their families to a decent level, when they have become injured or killed doing their duty for Queen and country.

©TITVS-ADVXAS XXX-VII-MMIX
As Published

Judge Trigger Triggers Cover-up by TITVS ADVXAS

Maybe I'm wrong? I am quite cynical of the way that Internet search engines throw up information on Page 1 of a search. There are always some results that are 'too good to be true' and when you open the page its something completely different AND its an advertisement! As was the case with a story from The BNP website this morning!

Money down the drain? (inset Judge Trigger)

Here a Judge who was presiding in the Liverpool Crown Court, Ian Trigger, vented several home truths about the UK's floored immigration system at a Jamaican Rastafarian, Lucien McClearley. McClearley had claimed asylum in Britain in October 2002 , following his arrival in Britain in November 2001 on a visitor’s visa, but his application was rejected in 2004. He then “disappeared from the radar of the authorities” and he was only arrested this February 2009 after a drug's raid of his house in Liverpool discovered cannabis worth £7,200, a gram of cocaine and a fake passport. This transcript is from The BNP website too.

“Your case illustrates all too clearly the completely lax immigration policy that exists and has existed over recent years,” Judge Trigger said.

“People like you, and there are literally hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people like you, come to these shores to avail themselves of the generous welfare benefits that exist here.

“In the past ten years the national debt of this country has risen to extraordinary heights, largely because central Government has wasted billions of pounds. Much of that has been wasted on welfare payments.

“For every £1 that the decent citizen, who is hard-working, pays in taxes, nearly ten percent goes on servicing that national debt. That is twice the amount it was in 1997 when this Government came to power.”

As I then "googled" Judge Ian Trigger, there were several stories from January 2008 where as The Daily Mail put it "Top judge attacks 'feral' yobs in a courtroom tirade" Curiously there were no matches to this news story, until the 3rd page. That said, The Express, The Telegraph, The Scum and Liverpool Daily Echo all seem to be running the story.

Unfortunately, Judge Triggers position of authority may be under threat because of his outspokenness.

©TITVS-ADVXAS XXX-VII-MMIX
As Published

A PC PC per se by TITVS ADVXAS

Reading a fellow blogger "UP POMPEII" I came across an article from the DAILY MAIL.

Apparently female Police workers in Avon & Somerset are being given Hijab, the Muslim "head scarf" to wear "when having close contact" with Muslim communities. The authority have two different scarves for use by different staff, here are the two versions - one matches the black of a police officer's uniform, while another goes with the blue uniforms worn by community support officer.

Trying them on for size...

In yet another one sided quote from the Muslim world, Rashad Azami, Imam and director of the Bath Islamic Society, said: 'It is highly pleasing to see that Avon and Somerset Constabulary is introducing specially designed head coverings for female officers. This will go a long way in encouraging a trustful relationship between the police and the Muslim community. The police have been working closely with the Muslim community for the last few years. We hope this step will further strengthen the mutual relationship.'

I bet!

Talking through her politically correct sphincter, Assistant Chief Constable Jackie Roberts (pictured above, right) said: 'It recognises and respects the cultural and religious practices of our communities. This is a very positive addition to the uniform and one which I'm sure will be a welcome item for many of our officers.'

Compare our barmy forces with their Norwegian equivalent who announced the opposite just a few months ago, "Norway will not go ahead with plans to allow women police officers to wear the hijab - the Muslim headscarf - as part of their uniform, the justice minister said Friday. Knut Storberget and his ministry has come under fire after the recent proposal to change regulations for police uniforms to allow religious headwear to be used was announced".

Of course a precedent was set in Egypt a few years ago when Her Majesty, The Queen, presumably on advice from her PC advisors, had her remove her shoes and don a niqab in order to enter a Mosque in Cairo.

Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II

For Gods Sake! She is the ruling monarch of a western country, taking of her shoes to enter a church. Will she do it, we wonder, the next time she is at St Paul's Cathedral watching one of her children remarry? or at Windsor doling out the Maundy money?

This year, the fire service unveiled full-length skirts, hijab headscarves and long- sleeved shirts for Muslim women recruits to wear in fire stations and for events such as school trips.

As I said in a blog just yesterday, this is beyond the thin edge of the wedge. What next? Will any police eating smokey bacon crisps not allowed to have contact with Muslim people unless they have had them steam cleaned (as they can't use alcohol-rub hand cleanser).

©TITVS-ADVXAS XXIX-VII-MMIX
As Published

A Freudian Slip? by TITVS ADVXAS

Is it just me? Or does everyone else have a similar mental block? When referring to our newly elected MEP for Yorkshire and Humberside, I keep saying ANDREW MARR instead of ANDREWS BRONS! I even said it when asking a question at a meeting last week.

Is it just that Marr is well known personality? Or that Mr Brons literally was thrust into the public domain from relative obscurity? Many BNP members outside of Yorkshire were unaware of Mr Brons prior to June 7th 2009, other than seeing his photo on the candidates page of The BNP website.

Now my lookalike (which was suggested by my friend Alex) shows Mr Brons and Charlie Slater (actor Derek Martin) So, who does Mr Marr look like..? Well its not Charlie Slater for one thing.

So the order of the day, please submit to me lookalikes for ANDREW MARR (and ANDREW BRONS too), and all submissions will be published on my lookalikes webpage.

For further details of my lookalikes webpage please email me for details.

©TITVS-ADVXAS XXVIII-VII-MMIX
As Published

When will we be shown the true light? by TITVS ADVXAS

Thousands of Muslims Gather in London to Demand a Caliphate. From the BNP website

So why all the fuss? After all we are already surrendering our cities, our churches and in The UK we are allowing 85 Sharia courts (22 of which are in The Midlands) to preside over matters that British Courts should in fact have jurisdiction.

Well in fact there was no fuss whatsoever. The state controlled media absolutely failed to report the recent meeting of thousands of Muslims, who gathered in London to Demand a Caliphate, in any way, shape or form. All the media, be it national tv, local tv, radio or any of the newspapers avoided any mention of this meeting. This can be proved quite easily by going to the main website of any of the media institutions, and entering keywords such as "London, 2009 and Caliphate" into their own search engines. For example, on the BBC site, the most recent reference is to an article from 2007. All that The Scum newspaper could offer was an advert for "London hotels from £15". (Khalid Mahmood please note!)

The outlandish demands from the meeting, to install another tier of government, are way beyond the thin edge of the wedge. These demands are like being asked for your front door keys to your house AND the codes of your burglar alarm. We are being told that "In this critical time, Muslims needed to hold onto Islamic values living in the West, and resist the attempts to reform Islam, and to support the call for the Islamic Khilafah in the Muslim world — to end decades of oppression, colonisation and dependency"
All I can say to that is, if you want your own style "Khalifah" government then return to a country where that style of government already exists. If you have fled that country due to persecution or freedom issues, then why do you wish to install a government that would persecute you or restrict your freedom once again?

This is a major issue! Why did no mainstream media report on the story? If these liberal-marxists bury their head in the sand for much longer, and events like this remain unreported, then the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland will become The Islamic Republic of Britain, and the Union flag or Union Jack as it is commonly referred to, whose first incarnation was used following the Union of Scotland and England in 1606, will be replaced with a crescent moon and star. At the current rates, this will be well before this 50 year old blogger is dead in the ground.

There is only one hope for Britain, and that is The British National Party, who will reverse these trends and restore Britain to its former glory. All BNP policies are available for viewing on The BNP Website. Please make time to read them, and you will see that BNP policies are REALISTIC, not racist (As The liberal-marxist establishment would have you believe).

©TITVS-ADVXAS XXVIII-VII-MMIX
As Published

The Last Tommy By TITVS ADVXAS

Passchendaele...

The remains of a Flemish Town...

Before and After...

By TITVS ADVXAS - As the nation mourns the last Tommy to survive World War One, it's a wonder Private Henry John Patch even lived to see the Armistice in 1918. Another heroic stalwart of the conflict, he was injured in battle when shrapnel exploded above him, killing three of his comrades, his closest chums, men with whom he'd trained and served and with whom he nearly did perish...

The Battle of Passchendaele (known also as the third Battle of Ypres) was one of the most notorious battles of the Great War, the war to end all wars. A battle supposedly won by the Allied triple entente is remembered for the mud. Haunting photographs remain of the barren skyline and the dead trees, their trunks and stumps left stark and broken as if by some giant child toying in the mud.The barren trenches and mud and unending torrential rain exemplified the utter waste of this war, where men who fell injured actually died by drowning in the sludge of the battleground.Although totals were slightly less than at the Somme a year earlier, one tenth of all Allied casualties from the entire "1418" conflict fell in this battle alone. Over half a million Allied soldiers lost or injured in just four months in 1917.

The alleged 1916 conversation between the German Generals Erich Ludendorff and Max Hoffmann which went along the lines that the English army 'were lions led by donkeys' rang true a year later as battalion after battalion of brave young Englishmen, Welshmen, Scotsmen and Irishmen, Canadians and Newfoundlanders, Indians, Anzacs and South Africans, were all thrown literally into the Flanders mire, by those Hooray Henries Generals Haig, Gough and Plumer.

The last English survivor from the trenches, a man who fought and was wounded at Passchendaele, Private Patch, died on Saturday (25th July 2009) aged 111. Ironically "Harry" outlived one of the other survivors of that war, Henry Allingham, by just 7 days, leaving just three others, of whom, only Claude Choule, 108, saw active service at sea, serving with the Royal Navy during World War I. Mr Choule was born in Worcestershire and now lives in Western Australia. The other two survivors are John Babcock and Frank Buckles. Mr Babcock, who turned 109 on 23 July, was with The Canadian Boys Battalion in England. The war ended before he turned 18 and could go to the front. Mr Buckles, 108, joined the American army at age 16 and was held in reserve in England from December 1917. After six months he was sent to France but never saw action on the frontline.

Born in Somerset in 1898, Harry Patch was a modest and gentle man. He never spoke publicly of his experiences in the war until 1998 when the BBC made a program entitled Veterans and interviewed several men from the ever decreasing number of real heroes. He received eight medals in his lifetime, including recent awards from France "Knight of the Legion d'honneur" in 1998 and from Belgium, "Knight of the Order of Leopold" in 2008. Harry left school in 1913, aged 14 and was conscripted to the Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry in October 1916. He served as an assistant gunner in a Lewis Gun section. Harry arrived in France in June 1917, and it was at Passchendaele on 22nd September where he was injured in the groin when a shell exploded overhead at 22:30 on 22 September 1917, killing his three comrades. Following the incident, he returned to England in December 1917. In later years, Harry always referred to 22 September as his own Remembrance Day.

The British National Party, it seemed to me, was the only political party who remembered Henry Allingham in the previous week, at meetings and in their own press. his weekend, the shame from the other parties from their own neglect, has forced them to remember Private Henry John Patch (retired) of Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry. The last Tommy.

In memory of Harry Patch 1898 to 2009. May God keep you and let you rest in peace.

This youtube clip was added on Sunday afternoon

©TITVS-ADVXAS XXV-VII-MMIX
As Published

A old lecture by an old master by TITVS ADVXAS

Arthur Kemp in March 2009

As many of the people who know me either in person, or through my online blogs, I've only become a member of the BNP this year. In this short time, I've been privileged to have seen both Nick Griffin and Simon Darby speaking publicly twice. Ive also seen the remarkable Arthur Kemp speak just the once, until this week, that is, when I saw him speak a second time. This time in a tiny Staffordshire village, on a main road, that if you'd blinked whilst driving trough, you'd miss it. Listen to me, ladies and gentlemen, what I'm going to tell you now is that... (Sorry I was off into my Kemp-Speak a little Orwellian themed joke) Seriously, Arthur is one of the most eloquent and informative speakers I've ever seen. Like Nick Griffin, his power of recall is phenomenal. Like Nick and Simon Darby, he is a real crowd pleaser and teaser. This afternoon, on YouTube, I found several Arthur Kemp lectures, but this one from 29th March 2009 is similar to the one I saw him give a little earlier, on 12th March 2009.








Phew!
©TITVS-ADVXAS XXIV-VII-MMIX
As Published

Government Plans for Multi-Cutleryism?

Following the UK government's huge success in forcing multi-culturalism on us and destroying the unique characteristics of our heritage, they have announced plans to extend the process to cutlery.


All credit for this to Dowlish

The Fifth Columnist by TITVS ADVXAS

Following a couple of reasonably well received articles from yours truly on The main BNP site, The BNP webmaster took me aside recently at a meeting we both attended to tell me that he'd given me my own column on the BNP site and was in the process of sorting me out with my own access and passwords. On accessing the BNP website, on the toolbar is COLUMNISTS. click on it and there's a list of just five Joe Priestly, John Bean, Martin Wingfield, Nick Griffin, and the fifth columnist TITVS ADVXAS. Imagine the lump in the throat and tear to the eye on seeing this? No Mrs Titvs wasn't preparing a noose for me! Just to be on the same stage as the other four is a privilege. This post is just a humble thanks to the people who have read my articles and given comments and given me this opportunity to help the BNP in my own little way. And a little message to the Cyber trolls of the loony left, Beware, Titvs Advxas is here, and he's on your case!!

©TITVS-ADVXAS XXII-VII-MMIX
As Published

Solihull BNP Draws Large Crowd to Hear Local Speakers

By TITVS ADVXAS - Around 70 people packed last night's British National Party Solihull meeting to hear three local speakers explain to newcomers why they had joined the party as the only way to save Britain.

First on the platform was pensioner and BNP activist George Rouse.

In his maiden speech before a party meeting, Mr Rouse told why he had joined the party and how he had worked hard in the past election with leafleting and fundraising activities.

"The BNP's policies are the only fair and just way in which the problems facing Britain can be sorted out," Mr Rouse said.

Next speaker was local activist David Jackson who entertained the audience with a comical and reasoned speech about the corruption of the old parties and the need for a transparent BNP government.

"The other parties' public representatives, from local councillors to MPs, have been proven to be corrupt," Mr Jackson said.

The interval, introduced by master of ceremonies and local organiser Frank O'Brien, was marked by a buffet and an entertaining karaoke. West Midlands secretary Mike Bell and other members provided great entertainment with an impromptu and rousing rendition of "Jerusalem."

Last speaker for the night was West Midlands training officer, Richard Lumby, who spoke on the causes behind the credit crunch and the necessity of Britain being completely economically independent.

The highly successful evening was topped with an announcement from deputy organiser Bob Lassen and fundholder Pat Jelley that the meeting had raised £316 through the raffle and collection.


©TITVS-ADVXAS XXII-VII-MMIX
As Published

Cannock BNP Honours Henry Allingham and British Service Personnels’ Sacrifice by TITVS ADVXAS

Making serious notes...

Arthur Kemp

Mr & Mrs Kemp

The Group Photo

Cannock British National Party met in Hednesford last night and kicked off with a two minute silence for Great War Veteran and the world’s oldest man, Henry Allingham and all British service personnel who had sacrificed for this country.

The meeting, chaired by fund holder Terry Majorowicz, was then introduced to several prospective local BNP candidates and sitting parish councillors who were in attendance.

Mr Majorowicz provided an amusing introduction and revealed how he had come to the BNP after first trying to do something for this country in the Conservative Party. “All they wanted to do was hold dinner parties, and it was only when I joined the BNP that I was finally able to do something about saving my country,” he said.

Next speaker was organiser Bill Vaughan who read a humorous piece about how ethnic minorities were allowed to organise along ethnic grounds without anyone objecting, but that if indigenous British people tried to do that, they were attacked by the media and other politicians.

Prospective candidate Ray Evan spoke next, giving his first ever public speech in which he pointed out how British people are discriminated against and put last in the provision of public services.

Before breaking for the second half, Mr Majorowicz introduced 70-year-old Bob and 88-year-old Alf, who are still active for the party in Cannock and who have not missed a meeting in three years.

The second half of the meeting was addressed by guest speaker Arthur Kemp, who used a George Orwell 1984 theme to illustrate how decades of Conservative and Labour rule had led to the total inversion of all the things which had made Britain great. His speech had the 30 plus crowd on their feet for a double ovation.

Schoolboy Sportsdays... By TITVS ADVXAS

Winter Sport was Rugby (Union) and Summer sports were Cricket and Athletics. This was my old fashioned Grammar School education. From a junior school where football was the all year-round sport, how things changed brutally for me in 1971.

I used to loathe Rugby. Being a diminutive 11 year old, I was made to play the 'hooker' in the heart of the scrum, and as the hooker was one of the forwards, I was made to run all over the pitch, heart of the scrum and heart of the action. Look at how the rugby teams lined up The scrum 7 giants and 1 vertically challenged person wearing number 2. All thugs with cauliflower ears, broken noses and a scar or two to boot. A team of 15 people, one common thread, all have psychotic tendencies. Right from the off, at school, it was apparent that the people who excelled in Rugby, had a screw loose. In each and every scrum, the hooker had his genitals mauled by members of his own team, and his head kicked by the opposing front row "props". The idea of a shorter person as hooker is so that he supposedly hung from the shoulders of the props and swung back and forth to kick the ball behind him. How I used to envy the wingers who in the early years of school could dance up and down the pitch and not get their hands or kit dirty, and certainly would keep their bits intact.
Roll on summer. Being small held me in no better stead. Groups of 22 boys had 2 captains chosen by teachers, who in turn picked their teams. Titvs Advxas was always 21 or 22, and as such batted at number 11 (if the innings got that far) and always seemed to be fielding at third man, never bowling nor being close up fielder! Eventually by 5th year (aka year 11) I learnt that I could sit on the field's edge with the batting teams for BOTH innings. Athletics was about the only sport I did enjoy. I used to scive off in the cross country runs but over the 5 years, eventually managed a six minute mile (1500 metre) in 1976, aged just 16. Over these school years, my real love Football, had absolutely no school input, other than those playtime 30 a side games and watching England and Aston Villa, on TV and down The Holte End. Villa managed to appear in 3 league cup finals winning twice in the 70s. England were pitiful, as under Alf Ramsay, Joe Mercer and Don Revie, regularly failed to achieve anything, apart from occasional wins in 'The Home Internationals' where England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland yearly played in an end of season mini tournament (until 1984)

Despite all this, I do enjoy watching Rugby, Athletics and Cricket. Take the example of Cricket. An international 'test' match, lasts 5 or 6 days. 11 players per team take two innings each, and the winner in the team that scores the most runs over the two innings. Plus hours and hours of waiting and mundane inactivity in between. Luckily the BBC (and recently Five) publish match highlights in the evening. Likewise, highlights of the Six Nations and The Olympics are a real boom.

When is "In Camera" actually IN THE CAMERA'S EYE by TITVS ADVXAS

How many people would vote BNP instead of UKIP or New Labour or TORY or even LIB/DEM, if their vote were 100% secret?

Despite secret ballot arrangements, voting is not secret in the UK, as it is possible to link a ballot paper to the person that cast it. Each ballot paper is individually numbered and embossed and each elector has a number. When an elector is given a ballot paper, their number is noted down on the embossed and again numbered counterfoil of the ballot paper. This means, of course, that the ballot is not secret at all. This measure is apparently justified by Big Brother as a security arrangement so that if there was an allegation of fraud, false ballot papers could be identified. This unlikely process of matching ballot papers to voters is permissible only by a Court order. The legal authority for this is set out in current Parliamentary acts.

I know personally two people who were scared to vote BNP in the recent European Elections. The reason was solely the privacy issue. Extrapolate that over the 1,000,000 BNP votes cast... not quite a landslide in terms of The BNP representation, but it would push us into the realms of the 3rd place position traditionally held by The LIB/DEMs in recent years.

Questions that have arisen surrounding this issue alone should be part of The BNP election manifesto,

Firstly: To calm and allay the fears of prospective voters.

Secondly: To propose a change in the law to make private votes private.

Thirdly: When we do come to power (when rather than if being the pertinent point), to actually fulfill the promise made in the manifesto, with a publicly viewed destruction of each and every counterfoil for every single election that is still in storage.

I have previously predicted 3 MPs in the 2009/10 elections, and a landslide in 2012/14. One single and apparently insignificant policy such as this could resonate to produce those massive gains. In camera is a Latin phrase meaning 'in chambers' or 'in private'. In camera when used in plain English is the opposite, IN PUBLIC.

So do we want our votes to be In Camera or In Camera?

©TITVS-ADVXAS XX-VII-MMIX
As Published

Why do we continue to put up with this? by TITVS ADVXAS

I've just read an article in The Daily Mail Online, about a Christian teacher, Nicholas Kafouris, who whilst working in as teacher in a Junior School (Bigland Green Primary in Tower Hamlets, East London) where the predominant pupils were of Muslim origin. Here he was openly racially abused by children for being a Christian. Mr Kafouris was dismissed from his £30,000 a year job following counter claims of racism by him to other staff and children, claims that he strenuously denies.

From the Mail article: In 2006, said Mr Kafouris, he brushed against a boy while giving him a book. 'He said rather brusquely to me, "Don't touch me, you're a Christian". I found this very offensive.'Later that year, he said children aged eight and nine in his class praised the suicide bombers in the 9/11 attacks. 'In late November and December 2006, many various unacceptable and openly racist, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian remarks were being made by many and various children in Year 4,' he said. 'These included, "We want to be Islamic bombers when we grow up", "the Twin Towers bombers are heroes and martyrs", "we hate the Jews" and "we hate the Christians".'

Imagine the scenario, a nice junior state school in Hampstead, NW3, London. (If you can find one that is not private). Hampstead is the area Nick Griffin pointed out where mass immigration is not prevalent in last weeks Andrew Marr show. Imagine a teacher from an ethnic minority being racially abused by Christian children there. If the Head teacher and governors then sacked the teacher after he had allegedly made counter racist remarks, imagine how Trevor Phillips and Simon Woolley would become involved. It just wouldn't happen would it?

These 8 and 9 year olds from Tower Hamlets have now been sanctioned and given the precedent to go and abuse British people for not being Muslim, and in 10 years time this will be the calibre of our voting adults.

The Beginnings - Rudyard Kipling

IT WAS not part of their blood,
It came to them very late
With long arrears to make good,
When the English began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy-willing to wait
Till every count should be proved
Ere the English began to hate.

Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight
There was neither sign nor show,
When the English began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.

It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate,
Through the chill years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the English began to hate.

©TITVS-ADVXAS XVIII-VII-MMIX
As Published

Bowling A Maiden Over by TITVS ADVXAS

Hitting the floor running is a well overused cliché from modern times, but I can think of no other term to describe Nick Griffin's maiden speech to the European Parliament.
In just over 2 minutes, he manages to OUT Tory leader David Cameron and 5 UK sitting MEP as supporters of The UAF, exposes the ever changing 'Official' underlying and hidden reasons that have and will be used to wage war again in the middle east, with Iran as the latest target, and finally tells the leaders to send their own families rather than the families of ordinary people to war.



The poem called "For The Fallen" is best known for it's 4th verse, used in remembrance. After watching Nick, read the whole poem, and do so without shedding tears. Impossible

"For The Fallen"

by Laurence Binyon

With proud thanksgiving, a mother for her children,
England mourns for her dead across the sea.
Flesh of her flesh they were, spirit of her spirit,
Fallen in the cause of the free.

Solemn the drums thrill; Death august and royal
Sings sorrow up into immortal spheres,
There is music in the midst of desolation
And a glory that shines upon our tears.

They went with songs to the battle, they were young,
Straight of limb, true of eye, steady and aglow.
They were staunch to the end against odds uncounted;
They fell with their faces to the foe.

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.

They mingle not with their laughing comrades again;
They sit no more at familiar tables of home;
They have no lot in our labour of the day-time;
They sleep beyond England's foam.

But where our desires are and our hopes profound,
Felt as a well-spring that is hidden from sight,
To the innermost heart of their own land they are known
As the stars are known to the Night;

As the stars that shall be bright when we are dust,
Moving in marches upon the heavenly plain;
As the stars that are starry in the time of our darkness,
To the end, to the end, they remain.

In WW1 our soldiers were referred to as "Lions led by Dinosaurs" (referring to the government and generals such as Haig and Kitchener)
Today it is more apt to just say Lions led by Cowards and Liars (the government)

©TITVS-ADVXAS XVI-VII-MMIX
As Published

The Morning After Pill... By TITVS ADVXAS

Getting ready to go out to a local BNP meeting, last night, I received a frantic phone call from local BNP activist, Mike Bell. "Have you seen The BNP website?" he enthused. Putting my face moisturiser down, I replied "Erm, no. Whats wrong?" Mike went on "You're on it, you're on it?" I dropped my steradent tube on the floor in horror. "OMG (Oh My God) have I been outed? Is the latest BNP members list back in the public domain? Will my family be safe? Whats going to happen? Woe is me!" By now I was sorting through my medicine cabinet looking for the GTN spray (glyceryl trinitrate spray, sprayed under the tongue for sub-lingual absorption into the blood, for the relief of angina pectoris, a severe pain in the chest bought on by conversations with Liverpudlians). "Stop bein' a Brummy nanse and listen" he calmly continued, "You're blog from Titvs about your Dad you posted today is on THE MAIN BNP website." By now I wasn't listening, my legs were like jelly and the sweat was pouring off my shiny noggin. "Are you there...?" enquired Michael. After a brief pause a tiny, squeaky voiced Titvs replied "Yes." Mr B then went on to explain that he had read it himself and was talking to someone at BNPHQ and mentioned it to him.

Seriously, in the space of 12 hours the post on the BNP site has received 60 plus comments. eclipsing my previous post on 1st March 2009, which has after 5 months still only got 48 comments. All these 60 plus were extremely supportive bar one, from midenglander, who claimed I was a long range patriot:

A good story that rings many bells with those of us of a "certain age". It is just a pity that the writer isn't ACTUALLY here in the Land of his Fathers fighting for the cause. This is clearly coming from the good old US of A. Alas, the world of this writer's father may never come again. Sorry to be cynical but long range patriotism never goes down well with me. It's a bit like all that mushy Irish Nationalism from the "forty million", Irish Americans, the "give a dollar and kill a Brit" brigade. Real Nationalists stay and resist the destruction of their homeland.

Midenglander, If I am a long range patriot, how did I manage to get to Bromsgrove last night and take the photograph posted top left? Telly-port bracelet? Voyager transporter beam? No I didn't! Why? Because I was born, was bred, and still live in Birmingham. I never said all Nationalists are 100% sensible did I?

©TITVS-ADVXAS XV-VII-MMIX
As Published

The World Of My Father By TITVS ADVXAS

As a youngster, growing up in a white working class area of Birmingham, known as Acocks Green, in the sixties, I was happy. I was oblivious too. Oblivious to the trends creeping through our nation, to the incipience of Islam within our shores, to the decay and decline within The Church Of England and to the corruption of both the political system in general and the big three political parties in particular.

My father was a sheet metal worker. A good one too by all accounts. A man who, as the industry collapsed around him, always found work, right up to the age of 70 in 1999, when he eventually retired. Dad celebrates his 80th birthday next month, and we will be holding a surprise party for him. Well it would have been a surprise apart from the fact that my Mom is organising it for him, Growing up, Dad never spoke about work much, other than complaining about Welders Flash he occasionally got through not wearing his visor. I always assumed he was in a union, although during the 70s and 80s he worked at about 6 different companies.
He always voted too, with my Mom. They voted mainly Liberal, because they believed that PR was the only way to true democracy, and as always, the minor parties place PR highly and optimistically on their agenda and manifesto.
Apart from weddings, funerals and bar mitzvahs (I am not Jewish, but have had the operation, which in 1962 was one of the first recorded operations involving micro-surgery in The UK), my parents only took me to church a handful of times. Out of democracy or plain respect for me, I don't know? They allowed me to make my own mind without any pressure from them. I chose not to go, so I never went to confirmation either. Well hopefully God will forgive me that massive mistake I made in my youth?
Nowadays both my parents have realised how they have been abused by the state, having gone through the hardships of retirement, yet seeing how eagerly immigrants are welcomed into the country, how they seem to get all the financial help they (immigrants) need and more,-including a £3000 giro for a car, plus £200 giro for a course of driving lessons if you can't drive the car you just bought with the first giro. All this and more from the coffers of the pension funds my parents helped to build. I truly believe my parents are now converted to the BNP. Dad now wears his 'Don't unpack, You're Going Back' and 'Enoch Powell Was Right' badges with pride, and always drinks from his 'Another White Mug'. All purchased from Excalibur, of course. (But as my Dad, he always would wear anything I buy him with pride, hence the statement "I truly believe my parents...")
Dad is always ringing me up, to ask about things reported in the press about the BNP, a notable one being the fake Gurkha leaflet story printed in "The Scum" newspaper. I had to go round to them and text a local BNP activist Mike Bell, before they would believe that it was a lie. At 80 its difficult to comprehend that your lifelong Daily Newspaper tells massive lies. Even worse, they have always lied, ever since being first published in the mid 1960s. He rings me up when The BNP are on TV, like on Sunday morning at 10:30am to say 'Your Boss' (Nick Griffin) was on The Andrew Marr Show. The thing they like about Nick is the fact he is passionate about England and being English, and that he speaks with a great authority about virtually everything. Dad said to me 'He'd make a good lawyer' not knowing that Nick is a good lawyer!
Now in the winter of their years, my parents, like many other peoples parents have worked hard all their lives, many years from hand to mouth. They have struggled to help to maintain and build this Country. My father was too young to fight in WWII, but as a child saw the sacrifice this nation made to fight and keep its identity then. (He proudly served in The RAF for his National Service in 1947).
Dad I will make damn sure that your struggle, our struggle was never in vain. We will keep this land Christain and we will fight off these invaders, in the words of Churchill, at whatever the cost shall be, We will never surrender, as long as the blood pumps through our veins.

©TITVS-ADVXAS XIV-VII-MMIX
As Published

Why won’t they wake up? by Robin Hood

(Printed from The British Nationalist)
It’s a question asked by quite a few within the lower ranks of the party and I feel an explanation of this is as good as any start to my regular posts on British Nationalist.

So why do White people vote the way they do despite “popular opinion” always being in contradiction to the policies of the major parties?

An analysis of White psychology by American professor Kevin McDonald details how Whites, through evolution, have become conscientious which has given rise to material and social success;

McDonald goes on to point out that conscientious people fear social ostracism which results in the material loss and rejection by the broader society,

The prevailing political correctness in the west means that any deviance from pro-multi-culturalism results in social ostracism.

Therefore, McDonald says, Whites avoid any overt display of ethnocentrism ;

Instead, they adopt coded social practices in which they can be ethnocentric, but do not have to use racial terms to describe them: ‘country music’; ’seeking a better place to raise children’ (to explain White Flight for example)

Whites therefore understand what is happening, but are afraid to associate themselves with overt ethnocentric policies because they fear ostracism.

Their behaviour however, is in direct contradiction to their apparent political choices.

McDonald explains this contradiction in terms of self-imposed censorship and screening, driven primarily by the urge to be conscientious and not face social ostracism. White people, he says, instinctively react negatively to their displacement by immigrants, but enforce learned self-control over their instinctive urges, in order to keep their social acceptance and not face social ostracism.

White ethnocentrism is very real and alive, it just manifests itself in ways which cannot be identified as an overtly pro-White fashion.

McDonald concludes by saying the the way out of this problem is twofold: firstly, bold assertive announcements by individuals of price in their racial and cultural heritage; and secondly, the creation of White associations where the Whiteness of that group is overt and regarded as the norm, rather than being cause for social exclusion.

To address the very real fear Whites have with the word ‘race’, requires more than just the two solutions McDonald suggests. The real issue is to tackle and identify those issues upon which the vast majority of the British public feel strongly, the EU, immigration, economics etc in a fashion which will make the comfortable to be associated with, and not make them think they will give up their social status by being known publicly to support such policies.

White voting patterns will not be broken by ‘racist’ arguments, but, by being given the ability to associate on an ethnocentric basis without giving offence to other groups or races;

If offered this alternative, the British voting public will break their traditional voting habits and leap at the chance to vote for a party which represents their instinctive views.
©THE BRITISH NATIONALIST XII-VII-MMIX
Printed with permission

More credulity? by TITVS ADVXAS

So whats going on here then? Firstly C4 and now BBC1, we see the BNP interviewed in an adult and professional manner without those previous attempts to seemingly undermine them? Knowing the NUJ and their blatant anti BNP guidelines, this can't be right? Are we being set up to be knocked down? Am I too paranoid about the whole thing?
Here's the interview on BBC iPlayer Nick getting about 8 minutes. And here it is on YouTube...




Apparently according to The BNP website, there was a fair chunk of the interview omitted. This is cut directly from the BNP mainwebsite:

What the Andrew Marr Show Did Not Let You Hear Nick Griffin Say
Europe has no right to censure Iran for the mistreatment of political dissidents when state-endorsed violence against political opponents is rife in Britain and Hungary, Nick Griffin MEP was cut short from saying on the Andrew Marr Show this morning.

Mr Griffin, making his first appearance as a Member of the European Parliament on the highly rated BBC show - from which the British National Party has been refused access till now - had his interview time cut short, ostensibly for a lengthening of the newspaper discussion session.After dealing with a number of vicious lies - which even included the one that his dogs are named Anne and Frank (a lie Mr Griffin successfully squashed on the show - they are, in fact, called Belle and Otto), Mr Griffin was going to answer a pre-primed question about the BNP’s agenda in the European parliament. “I was going to tell viewers that we would, along with other nationalists, expose the hypocrisy of the liberal elite on all levels and were going to start with their moves to censure Iran for that country’s treatment of its political dissidents,” Mr Griffin told BNP News after the show. “While what has happened in Iran is disgraceful, the reality is that the Hungarian government has used extreme force and violence against political dissidents in that country, particularly against the Jobbik party,” Mr Griffin said. “The Hungarian police regularly use violence against peaceful protestors and the EU never says a word. This is because the victims are not supporters of the EU con game,” he said. “In Britain, we have the state-endorsed UAF/Searchlight organisation of far leftist extremists, who are official endorsed by all the other political parties. They have a publicly reported track record of violent attacks again the BNP. These have included attacks on individuals with claw hammers, public violence and attacks on people trying to attend BNP meetings,” Mr Griffin said. “The leader of the Conservative party, David Cameron, is a founding member of the UAF group, which also boasts the signatures of leaders of the Labour, Liberal-Democrat and other parties. Yet for some reason, the EU is strangely silent on this state-endorsed violence against British political dissidents, organised by gangs who are supported with lottery and trade union money.” Mr Griffin said the Euro-nationalists would be campaigning against the EU’s moves on Iran, which are “part of an increasing tide of war propaganda designed to drag us into yet another wicked, immoral and unjustifiable Middle Eastern war.” * Mr Griffin said the producers of the Andrew Marr Show did apologise to him afterwards for having cut the show short.

Call me a cynic, but wasn't the stuff left out about Iran and EU condoning of State run violence like that by the UAF, possibly the most pertinent part of the interview, where Nick was showing the country his eloquence and vast depth of knowledge? The reason for cutting Nicks interview down was the over run of the review of the Sunday Newspaper. The trio of supposed experts had an Antipodean angle and were firstly Australian News columnist from both The Daily Mail (Platell's People) and The Gruadian (Voice From the Right) Amanda Platell, Former Australian Rupert Mudoch Employee, Sun Editor David Yelland and TV anchor, Sir Trevor McDonald (who has I'm told visited Australia). A right old combination whose hidden agenda was surely to meander the papers and to deliberately overrun their time slot. Where was the BBC time keeper then? All politicians are equal, but some politicians are more equal than others, it seems?

George Orwell/ Eric Blair's signature

©TITVS-ADVXAS XII-VII-MMIX
As Published