Monday, 21 September 2009

BNP Down yet again By TITVS ADVXAS

Well it looks like the Labour Government is using some the money it's supposed to be saving with all the announced cuts, by bankrolling another ddos attack on the BNP website. Only an assumption at present, but why else would the site be down? After the last event, which the UAF websites gleefully boasted, coincided with our RWB, we wonder why pick this week? Surely they don't want the Yellow Frenzy in Bournemouth to be overshadowed. If conference sabotage were the case, I'd wait until UAF supporter, David Cameron's Tory party conference in a few weeks time, because that's when I'd worry about the BNP opinion. Or perhaps they know something else? Perhaps Nick will get the call on Tuesday to ask him to attend the QT on Thursday this week? Who knows.
I have re-posted my article written during the last ddos attack, questioning the cost and how the money trail should be visible to our boys in blue and to the merchant bankers (yes it is cockney rhyming slang, and a suitable pun in reference to the fat cats)...

Down but not out. Never. By TITVS ADVXAS

The recent sustained Denial Of Service attack (DDos or distributed denial-of-service attack) on The British National Party website raises questions as to the cost of such an outrageous attack and the financiers of it.

The last sustained attack on The BNP website that caused some disruption was in the run up to the European elections at the end of May.

From Simon Darby's blog on Sunday 24th and Monday 25th May, I have taken the following information:

1. The Counter Terrorism Unit at Scotland Yard is now investigating.

2. MI5 have now been alerted to this incident which has serious implications for UK security.

3. The Labour Party aligned "Searchlight" organisation is now being investigated by the Metropolitan Police for a similar attack on the servers of Clear Channel (in the preceding days before the DOS attack on us). The situation is compounded by the fact that "Searchlight" actually works for the Metropolitan Police. The size of the assault is unparalleled and there is no doubt that whoever has organised this has had to pay out a serious amount of money to the criminal underworld.

Looking at an American trading company who were held to ransom for $100,000 under the threat of a DOS attack, the company spokeswoman speaking about the gangs responsible, said "If we get an attack of greater than 400MB our ISP will shut us off." She added "But for an ISP that could probably take out their whole data centre, so that is only fair"

That means until the police catch the gangs, there are believed to be two main ones originating from Eastern Europe who control tens of thousands of compromised PCs, the IT departments of online merchants will have to be on their toes.

The BNP website has been down for an extended period, as Simon Bennett, the webmaster, has been spending time to transfer all the current information to a new mainframe with sophisticated hardware and software to defend against another attack.

If the benefit to the Iron curtain gangs is possibly in excess of $100,000 for a US extortion, one could easily assume that the price they'd charge a LiLaC representative, to do a similar thing against The BNP would be in the same order (or probably more) than they'd expect to receive for their overt crimes.

So which arm of the crooked elites will we laundering £75,000 to an Eastern European consortium?

Surely the corrupt bankers will know as either this money has been transferred to them electronically, or in a large luggage case.

Either way, being more than £10,000, it should alert the money laundering squad to investigate!

But I am damn sure they won't!